Sun 8:30 a.m.-1 p.m., Tue-Thu 9 a.m.-2 p.m., Sat 3:30-6:30 p.m. | 630 E. University Dr. Granger, IN 46530 | (574) 243-2020

Cart

Cart

Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop

    Shao Kai Tseng

    Showing the single result

    • Karl Barths Infralapsarian Theology

      $40.99

      Foreword By George Hunsinger
      Acknowledgments
      Abbreviations
      Introduction

      Part I: Reappraising Barth’s Lapsarian Position
      1. Supra- And Infralapsarianism In The Seventeenth Century: Some Definitions
      2. Church Dogmatics 33: Barth’s Lapsarian Position Reassessed

      Part II: Barth’s Lapsarian Position In Development, 1920-1953
      3.Romerbrief II (1920-1921): Lapsarianism In The “Impossible Possibility” Dialectic
      4. The Gottingen-Munster Period (1921-1930): Christology And Predestination In The Subject-Object Dialectic
      5. The Bonn Years (1930-1935): Human Talk And Divine Word-New Developments?
      6. Gottes Gnadenwahl (1936): Infralapsarian Aspects Of Barth’s Christocentric Doctrine Of Election
      7. CD II/2 (1939-1942): Christ As Electing God And Elected Human-Lapsarianism “Purified”
      8. CD IV/1 (1951-1953): Adamic History And History Of Christ-Infralapsarian Tendencies In Barth’s Doctrine Of Sin

      Conclusion
      Bibliography
      Author Index
      Subject Index

      Additional Info
      Theologians have long assumed that Karl Barth’s doctrine of election is supralapsarian. Challenging decades of scholarship, Shao Kai Tseng argues that despite Barth’s stated favor of supralapsarianism, his mature lapsarian theology is complex and dialectical, critically reappropriating both supra- and infralapsarian patterns of thinking. Barth can be described as basically infralapsarian because he sees the object of election as fallen humankind and understands the incarnation as God’s act of taking on human nature in its condition of fallenness. Tseng shows that most of Barth’s Reformed critics have not understood his doctrine of election accurately enough to recognize his affinity to infralapsarianism and, conversely, that most Barthians have not understood Reformed-orthodox formulations of election with sufficient accuracy in their disagreement with the tradition. Karl Barth’s Infralapsarian Theology offers a clear understanding of both the historic Lapsarian Controversy and Barth’s distinct form of lapsarianism, providing a charitable dialogue partner to aid mutual understanding between Barth and evangelicals.

      in stock within 3-5 days of online purchase

      Add to cart

    Cart

    Cart

    Your Cart is Empty

    Back To Shop